Dixon v. Astrue
| Julius Dixon |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| 7:2008cv00218 |
| December 23, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office |
| DUPLIN |
| Louise Wood Flanagan |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER granting 17 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying 23 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; and, adopting in part 25 Memorandum and Recommendations. Signed by Chief Judge Louise Wood Flanagan on 12/04/09. Copies served electronically. (Baker, C.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dixon v. Astrue | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Julius Dixon | |
| Represented By: | Diane S. Griffin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
