GARDNER v. JACOBS
Plaintiff: CHARLES BOYD GARDNER
Defendant: JACOBS
Case Number: 1:2010cv00245
Filed: March 26, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDED RULING - MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 7 MOTION to Amend 2 Complaint filed by CHARLES BOYD GARDNER be GRANTED, but that the Complaint as so amended be dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) for failing to state a claim and for being frivolous signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 6/15/10. (Wilson, JoAnne)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GARDNER v. JACOBS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHARLES BOYD GARDNER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JACOBS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?