Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv25046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Jeaudoin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv05843
Plaintiff:
Jacob Jeaudoin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
BRACKLEY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2026cv02633
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BRACKLEY, JESSICA BUSTLE, JOSHUA BUSTLE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03259
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jacobs v. Bisignano
as 7:2026cv00304
Plaintiff:
Bernard Jacobs
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Kinn v. Bolin
as 0:2026cv03408
Petitioner:
Jacob William Kinn
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CARE CREATIONS INC. v. SHOCHAT
as 2:2026cv09339
Plaintiff:
care creations, Inc. doing business as Eden Fine Art
Defendant:
Jacob Shochat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GARCIA et al v. GRIFFITH et al
as 2:2026cv09338
Plaintiff:
IGNACIO GARCIA, RAMONA SANCHEZ ESTEVEZ, CHRISTIAN ARNAUD VALDEZ and others
Defendant:
TYLER JACOB GRIFFITH, HOME DEPOT USA, INC., JOHN DOES 1-100 (fictitious names) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
GARCIA et al v. GRIFFITH et al
as 3:2026cv09338
Plaintiff:
IGNACIO GARCIA, RAMONA SANCHEZ ESTEVEZ, CHRISTIAN ARNAUD VALDEZ and others
Defendant:
TYLER JACOB GRIFFITH, HOME DEPOT USA, INC., JOHN DOES 1-100 (fictitious names) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
