Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Poulson v. Furda et al
as 9:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Kermit Ty Poulson
Defendant:
Jacob Furda and Heidi Ulbricht
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rolfs v. City of Great Falls et al
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Nathan Rolfs
Defendant:
City of Great Falls, Cascade County, Lance Souza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Corecivic Prison et al
as 4:2022cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jacob Smith
Defendant:
Corecivic Prison, Warden, Mr. Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arvidson v. Isbell
as 6:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Bryan Arvidson
Defendant:
Jacob Isbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Designated Hearings Officer Johnson et al
as 6:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Jacob Smith
Defendant:
Designated Hearings Officer Johnson, Roxanne Wigert, James Salmonsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birdsley v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jacob Birdsley
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Montana Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 6:2021cv00071
Plaintiff:
Jacob Smith
Defendant:
Montana Board of Pardons and Parole, Montana Department of Corrections, Missoula Pre-Release Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2021cv00070
Petitioner:
Jacob Smith
Respondent:
Jim Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Carter v. McKinnon et al
as 6:2021cv00049
Plaintiff:
Clayton Carter
Defendant:
Jeffery McNabb, Bryceson McKinnon and Jacob Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Salmonsen et al
as 6:2021cv00040
Respondent:
James Salmonsen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Petitioner:
Jacob Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
