SATTERFIELD v. HAYNES
Petitioner: BILLY GRAY SATTERFIELD
Respondent: HAYNES
Case Number: 1:2010cv00836
Filed: November 2, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina
Office: NCMD Office
County: Forsyth
Presiding Judge: UNASSIGNED
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND RECOMMENDATION - MAGISTRATE JUDGE re 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by BILLY GRAY SATTERFIELD be DENIED, 5 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by WALLACE SHIELDS GRANTED, and that Judgment be entered dismissing this action signed by MAG/JUDGE L. PATRICK AULD on 9/9/11. (Wilson, JoAnne)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SATTERFIELD v. HAYNES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: BILLY GRAY SATTERFIELD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: HAYNES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?