Cases 1 - 10 of 5,325
Haynes v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02120
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Haynes
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ryan Haynes v. United States
as 24-1939
Petitioner:
Ryan Nicholas Haynes
Respondent:
United States of America
Buchanan v. Roberts et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Buchanan
Defendant:
Roberts, Bata, Thomas Hurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bowens et al
as 3:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Demond Williams
Defendant:
Officer Bowens, Officer MakanJuda, Officer Jeffers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman Monzon v. Jennifer Spangler
as 24-6384
Plaintiff:
ROMAN SEBASTIAN MONZON
Defendant:
JENNIFER D. SPANGLER, Mental Health Department at RNCC, ROBERT STURDIVANT, Mental Health Department at RNCC and DAYNA HAYNES, Mental Health Department at RNCC
Haynes, Marquise v. Dade Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv21551
Plaintiff:
Marquise Haynes
Defendant:
Dade Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Swift v. Dunagan et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Lawrence J Swift
Defendant:
Heath Dunagan, Clint Baker, John C Haynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
Ryan Scott Adams and Rooster
Defendant:
Robert Jackson, Ronald Haynes, Jane Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Shonaz Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
Shonaz Foods, Inc. and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organization Act
Haynes v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01783
Plaintiff:
Howard Haynes
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
