STUART, et al v. HUFF, et al
| GRETCHEN S. STUART, M.D., JAMES R. DINGFELDER, M.D., DAVID A. GRIMES, M.D., AMY BRYANT, M.D., SERINA FLOYD, M.D., DECKER & WATSON, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRAL NORTH CAROLINA, A WOMAN'S CHOICE OF RALEIGH, INC., PLANNED PARENTHOOD HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC. and TAKEY CRIST, M.D., |
| JANICE E. HUFF, M.D., ROY COOPER, LANIER M. CANSLER, JIM WOODALL, TRACEY E. CLINE, DOUG HENDERSON, BILLY WEST, C. COLON WILLOUGHBY, JR., BENJAMIN R. DAVID, JIM O'NEILL and ERNIE LEE |
| 1:2011cv00804 |
| September 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| NCMD Office |
| Orange |
| L. PATRICK AULD |
| CATHERINE C. EAGLES |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
181
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 1/25/2016. The motion for attorneys' fees and expenses is GRANTED and the defendants shall pay the following amounts to the following plaintiffs within ninety days: (1) To ACLU-NC: $70,312.50; (2) To CRR: $509,072.30; (3) To ACLU: $109,556.98; (4) To Planned Parenthood: $136,920.09; (5) To OMelveny & Myers: $217,454.60. (Daniel, J)
|
|
Filing
163
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 1/17/2014; For the foregoing reasons, both parties' motions for summary judgment, (Docs. 105 , 117 ), will be granted in part and denied in part. A permanent injunction and final judgment will follow. (Sheets, Jamie)
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 12/22/11, that movants' Motion to Intervene (Doc. 44 ) is DENIED. (Law, Trina)
|
|
Filing
66
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 12/19/2011, that the Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 8 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as set forth in this Memorandum Opin ion. FURTHER, that the Defendants and their agents and successors in office are hereby ENJOINED from enforcing—by civil action, criminal proceeding, administrative action or proceeding, or any other way—the Act's section entitled "Display of real-time view requirement" (to be codified as N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-21.85) in its entirety, as more specifically set forth in the Preliminary Injunction issued concomitantly herewith. (Lloyd, Donna)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER signed by JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES on 10/25/2011, that the Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Doc. 8 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as set forth in this Memorandum Opinion. IT IS FURTHER OR DERED that the Defendants' and their agents and successors in office are hereby ENJOINED from enforcing by civil action, criminal proceeding, administrative action or proceeding, or any other waythe Act's section entitled Display of real-time view requirement (to be codified as N.C. Gen. Stat. § 90-21.85) in its entirety, as more specifically set forth in the Preliminary Injunction issued concomitantly herewith (Lapira, Sharon)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
