Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Derrick Allen v. Jennifer Elwell
as 21-2142
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK MICHAEL ALLEN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JENNIFER ELWELL, SBI LABORATORY TECHNICIAN, MARK NELSON, SBI LAB TECHNICIAN, CERLYN DAVIS, POLICE CHIEF and others
Anthony Patterson, Jr. v. Arthur Holland
as 21-6502
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. BRITT, JR., JED TAUB, RUTH A. BROWN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY PATTERSON, JR.
PATTERSON v. HOLLAND et al
as 1:2021cv00158
Defendant:
RUTH A. BROWN, TRACEY E. CLINE, JOHN G. BRITT and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PATTERSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTERSON v. HOLLAND et al
as 1:2020cv00931
Defendant:
RUTH A. BROWN, TRACEY E. CLINE, JOHN G. BRITT and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PATTERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Samuel Biers v. Tracey Cline
as 17-1619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL BIERS
Defendant - Appellee:
TRACEY E. CLINE
Defendant:
PAUL MARTIN, DURHAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, MICHAEL ANDREWS and others
Gretchen Stuart v. Paul Camnitz
as 14-1150
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD
BIERS v. CLINE, et al
as 1:2012cv00375
Defendant:
TRACEY E. CLINE, PAUL MARTIN , DURHAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL BIERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, MD, on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, MD, on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, MD, in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., MD, GREGORY J. BRANNON, MD, CHIMERE COLLINS and others
Gretchen Stuart v. Janice Huff
as 12-1052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, M.D., on behalf of herself and her patients seeking abortions, JAMES R. DINGFELDER, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions, DAVID A. GRIMES, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients seeking abortions and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, M.D., in her official capacity as President of the North Carolina Medical Board and her employees, agents and successors, ROY COOPER, in his official capacity as Attorney General of North Carolina and his employees, agents and successors, LANIER M. CANSLER, in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services an his employees, agents and successors and others
Appellant:
JOHN M. THORP, JR., M.D., GREGORY J. BRANNON, M.D., CHIMERE COLLINS and others
STUART, et al v. HUFF, et al
as 1:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
GRETCHEN S. STUART, M.D. , JAMES R. DINGFELDER, M.D. , DAVID A. GRIMES, M.D. and others
Defendant:
JANICE E. HUFF, M.D. , ROY COOPER , LANIER M. CANSLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
