TUCKER v. KIVETT et al
| CORNELIUS TUCKER |
| SHERIFF SCHATZMAN, CPL. KIVETT, CAPT. GUARD SETTLE, SGT INGLE, MAJOR SLATER, SHIPMAN, GUARD BOGNER, NURSE MCKOY, CHIEF OF WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, INTERNAL AFFAIRS DIVISION, DR. CUNNINGHAM, SGT DORN, CATRINA THOMPSON, AMY LEEPER and CORPORAL MONEY |
| 1:2018cv00897 |
| October 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 26 Corporate Disclosure Statement by CUNNINGHAM. (MILAK, JENNIFER) |
| Filing 25 Corporate Disclosure Statement by MCKOY. (MILAK, JENNIFER) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney JENNIFER BRYANT MILAK on behalf of Defendants CUNNINGHAM, MCKOY (MILAK, JENNIFER) |
| Filing 23 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by CUNNINGHAM, MCKOY. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(MILAK, JENNIFER) |
| Set Answer Deadline: KIVETT answer due 1/22/2018; MONEY answer due 1/22/2018; SETTLE answer due 1/22/2018; SLATER answer due 1/22/2018. (Taylor, Abby) |
| TEXT ORDER granting #22 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by KIVETT, MONEY, SETTLE, SLATER. For good cause shown, the motion is granted. Defendants KIVETT, MONEY, SETTLE, and SLATER shall have up to and including January 22, 2019 to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Issued by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 12/18/2018.(Lee, Pedra) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Complaint by KIVETT, MONEY, SETTLE, SLATER. (ALBRIGHT, LONNIE) |
| Filing 21 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed pursuant to FRCP 7.1(a) by Defendants KIVETT, MONEY, SETTLE, SLATER (ALBRIGHT, LONNIE) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by attorney LONNIE GLENN ALBRIGHT, III on behalf of Defendants KIVETT, MONEY, SETTLE, SLATER (ALBRIGHT, LONNIE) |
| Motions Referred: RE: #22 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer Complaint, to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER (Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 19 USMS Return Executed as to Defendants, SETTLE, MONEY, CUNNINGHAM, MCKOY, SLATER. Answer due 01/02/2019. (Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 18 USMS Return Unexecuted as to Defendant SCHATZMAN. (Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 17 Summons Issued as to INGLE, KIVETT. (Copy of #2 , #3 , #4 Order, #5 , #6 , #7 , #8 , #9 , #10 , #11 , [12 ], #14 delivered to U.S. Marshal for service) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Taylor, Abby) |
Filing 16
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 12/13/2018, that the Clerk shall return to Plaintiff all documents recently received by the Court. Should Plaintiff desire to further amend or supplement his Complaint, he should do so within the guidelines of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Middle District Local Rules. The Clerk shall send Plaintiff a copy of Local Rules 7.3 and 15.1 along with this order.(Taylor, Abby)
|
| CASE REFERRED to Judge MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Marsh, Keah) |
| Filing 15 Summons Issued as to SCHATZMAN, SLATER. (Copy of #2 , #3 , #4 Order, #5 , #6 , #7 , #8 , #9 , #10 , #11 , #12 , #14 delivered to U.S. Marshal for service) (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 14 Notice of Right to Consent. U.S. Marshal shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent form)(Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 13 Summons Issued as to CHIEF OF WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, CUNNINGHAM, DORN, INTERNAL AFFAIRS DIVISION, AMY LEEPER, MCKOY, MONEY, SETTLE, CATRINA THOMPSON. (Copy of #2 , #3 , #4 Order, #5 , #6 , #7 , #8 , #9 , #10 , #11 , #12 delivered to U.S. Marshal for service.) (Attachments: #1 Additional summons, #2 Envelope - Front and Back)(Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 12 SUPPLEMENT re #8 Amended Complaint by Plaintiff CORNELIUS TUCKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT re #3 Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff CORNELIUS TUCKER. (Attachments: #1 Inner Envelope front and back, #2 Outer Envelope front and back) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 10 SUPPLEMENT to #3 Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff CORNELIUS TUCKER. (Attachments: #1 Inner Envelope front and back 1, #2 Inner Envelope Front and Back 2, #3 Affidavit Outer Envelope Front and Back) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT re #8 Amended Complaint filed by Plaintiff CORNELIUS TUCKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by CORNELIUS TUCKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 7 SUPPLEMENT re #2 Complaint by Plaintiff CORNELIUS TUCKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENT re #2 Complaint by Plaintiff CORNELIUS TUCKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Taylor, Abby) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT re #2 Complaint by Plaintiff CORNELIUS TUCKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Taylor, Abby) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 11/02/2018, that Plaintiff in the above-named action be, and is hereby, permitted to file and prosecute said action in this Court without prepayment of fees or giving security therefor, subject to the conditions set forth below. FURTHER ORDERED that, as a condition of Plaintiff's proceeding in forma pauperis, Plaintiff's current custodian and/or trust officer shall, starting with the month of December of 2018, collect, set aside, and pay from Plaintiff's trust account on a continuing basis 20 percent of the deposits to Plaintiff's account until the full filing fee and any costs, should they be assessed at a later date, have been paid in full. Unless the Court orders otherwise and except for final payment, such payments shall be made each time the set aside balance in Plaintiff's account exceeds $10.00 until the $350.00 filing fee has been paid. FURTHER ORDERED that all payments deducted in relation to this case shall be designated as made in payment of the filing fee for Civil Action No. 1:18CV897, and shall be paid to the Clerk, U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. In the event Plaintiff is transferred to another institution, the balance due shall be collected and paid to the Clerk by the custodian at Plaintiff's next institution. A copy of this Order shall be sent to Plaintiff's current custodian. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a summons for each defendant named in the complaint. Plaintiff must fill out a summons for each defendant, including an address suitable for service, and then return the summons(es) to the Clerk. Failure to provide an address wherein service may be made on any defendant will result in the dismissal of the action as to all such unserved defendants after 90 days from the filing of the complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal, upon return of the properly completed summons(es) shall serve the Complaint on the defendant(s). (Garland, Leah)
|
| Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by CORNELIUS TUCKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by CORNELIUS TUCKER. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (Garland, Leah) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by CORNELIUS TUCKER. (Garland, Leah) |
| CASE REFERRED for Screening. (Garland, Leah) |
| Case ASSIGNED to JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (Garland, Leah) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
