Cases 1 - 10 of 14
WARDLOW SR. v. FAW et al
as 1:2023cv00850
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LEWIS WARDLOW, SR.
Defendant:
C.J. FAW, D.W. COPPOLA, J.M. REYES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Anderson v. Winston Salem Police Department
as 23-6609
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, Sued in official capacity, BOBBY KIMBROUGH, Chief of sheriff sued in individual and official capacity, CATRINA THOMPSON, Chief of police sued in individual and official capacity and others
FORD v. KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK et al
as 1:2021cv00269
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, CATRINA THOMPSON, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK and others
Plaintiff:
DANNY L. FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Hazelrigg et al
as 5:2020ct03169
Defendant:
Nurse William, Jim O'Neill, Advocacy Worker and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2020cv00391
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
DOCTOR CUNNINGHAM, DOCTOR MARK HAZELRIGG, LT. WHITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01427
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Catrina Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
TUCKER v. THOMPSON et al
as 1:2019cv00577
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
ADAMS, LT. G. A. DORN, BOBBY KIMBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431
Tucker v. Bailey et al
as 5:2019ct03083
Defendant:
Bobby Kimbrough, Jason Adams, Mike Causey and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. WHITT et al
as 1:2019cv00285
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
K. ADAMS, GUARD OWENS, BOBBY KIMBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00277
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., SMITH/KEEFE COMMISSARY/PROVIDER, CATRINA THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
