LEE v. KERSEY et al
| MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE |
| RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, KIM FOYE, HAYDEN, SARAH HUNT, STEPHANIE HUDSON, CHRIS SMITH, LAMPLY, PEARSONS, JANE DOE and JOHN DOE |
| 1:2023cv01065 |
| December 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina |
| CATHERINE C EAGLES |
| JOE L WEBSTER |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 USMS Return Executed for COMPLAINT, SUMMONS, ORDER served on RALPH KERSEY on 1/11/2024. (sh) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney CAITLIN TELLECHEA AUGERSON on behalf of Defendants KIM FOYE, HAYDEN, STEPHANIE HUDSON, SARAH HUNT, RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, LAMPLY, PEARSONS, CHRIS SMITH (AUGERSON, CAITLIN) |
| Answer updated for KIM FOYE to 3/4/2024; HAYDEN to 3/4/2024; STEPHANIE HUDSON to 3/4/2024; SARAH HUNT to 3/4/2024; RALPH KERSEY to 3/4/2024; B.J. KNIGHT to 3/4/2024; LAMPLY to 3/4/2024; PEARSONS to 3/4/2024; CHRIS SMITH to 3/4/2024. (sh) |
| TEXT ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer filed by KIM FOYE, HAYDEN, STEPHANIE HUDSON, SARAH HUNT, RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, LAMPLY, PEARSONS, CHRIS SMITH. FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, the Motion of defendants Ralph Kersey, B. J. Knight, Kim Foye, Hayden, Sarah Hunt, Stephanie Hudson, Chris Smith, Lamply, and Pearsons ("Moving Defendants") for an extension of time in which to file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 in response to the Complaint filed by the pro se Plaintiff is hereby GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time in which Moving Defendants may file and serve their answer or other responsive pleading to the pro se Plaintiff's Complaint is extended up to and through March 4, 2024. Issued by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 01/31/2024.(aet) |
| Motions Referred: RE: #14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint , to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER (rw) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by attorney JAMES R. MORGAN, JR on behalf of Defendants KIM FOYE, HAYDEN, STEPHANIE HUDSON, SARAH HUNT, RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, LAMPLY, PEARSONS, CHRIS SMITH (MORGAN, JAMES) |
| Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #2 Complaint by KIM FOYE, HAYDEN, STEPHANIE HUDSON, SARAH HUNT, RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, LAMPLY, PEARSONS, CHRIS SMITH. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(MORGAN, JAMES) |
| Filing 13 USMS Return Executed for Complaint, Summons, Order served on SARAH HUNT, PEARSONS on 1/26/2024. Answers due 2/16/2024. (Attachments: #1 PEARSONS)(sh) |
| Filing 12 USMS Return Executed as to CAPTAIN LAMPLY on 01/11/2024. Answer due by 2/1/2024. (lg) |
| Motions Referred: RE: #11 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint, to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER (rw) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint by MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE. Response to Motion due by 2/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (sh) |
| Filing 10 USMS Return Executed for Complaint, Summons, Order served on B.J. KNIGHT, KIM FOYE, HAYDEN, STEPHANIE HUDSON, CHRIS SMITH on 1/11/2024. Answer due 2/1/2024. (Attachments: #1 Foye, #2 Hayden, #3 Hudson, #4 Smith) (sh) |
| Motions Referred: RE: #7 MOTION to Substitute Party, to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER (rw) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Right to Consent. USMS shall serve the attached form on all parties. (Attachments: #1 Consent form)(at) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to KIM FOYE, HAYDEN, STEPHANIE HUDSON, SARAH HUNT, RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, LAMPLY, PEARSONS, CHRIS SMITH. (Copy of complaint, memorandum, order, summons delivered to USMS for service) (at) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Substitute Party by MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back)(at) |
| Filing 6 STANDARD ORDER for civil cases proceeding before CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES.(rw) |
| Motions Referred: RE: #5 MOTION, to MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER (rw) |
| Filing 5 MOTION TO ADD DEFENDANT(S) AND CLAIMS(S) by MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE. Response to Motion due by 1/17/2024. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Envelope - Front and Back) (ab) |
Filing 4
ORDER signed by MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER on 12/13/2023, that Plaintiff in the above-named action be, and is hereby, permitted to file and prosecute said action in this Court without prepayment of fees or giving security therefor, subject to the conditions set forth below. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as a condition of Plaintiff's proceeding in forma pauperis, Plaintiff's current custodian and/or trust officer shall, starting with the month of January of 2024, collect, set aside, and pay from Plaintiff's trust account on a continuing basis 20 percent of the deposits to Plaintiff's account until the full filing fee and any costs, as set out herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall send Plaintiff a summons for each defendant named in the complaint, as set out herein. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshal, upon return of the properly completed summons(es) shall serve the Complaint on the defendant(s). (ab)
|
| Filing 3 MEMORANDUM re #2 Complaint by Plaintiff MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE. (at) |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE. (at) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION to Proceed IFP by MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE. (Attachments: #1 Envelope - Front and Back) (at) |
| CASE REFERRED for Screening (at) |
| Case Assigned to CHIEF DISTRICT JUDGE CATHERINE C. EAGLES and MAG/JUDGE JOE L. WEBSTER. (at) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the North Carolina Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
