Cases 1 - 10 of 15
WILLIAMS v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
DEDRICK L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, KIM FOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANTRANTRINO LEE
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, B.J. KNIGHT, KIM FOYE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A.M. v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv00994
Plaintiff:
Latoya Monley and A. M.
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, sheronica smith, SHERIFF RALPH KERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
JOHNSON v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2020cv00251
Defendant:
MICHAEL WOODS, JOHN DOE, RALPH KERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. KERSEY
as 1:2019cv01065
Defendant:
SHERIFF RALPH KERSEY
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL DEWAYNE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASALAAM v. KERSEY et al
as 1:2018cv00314
Plaintiff:
SULYAMAN AL ISLAM WASALAAM
Defendant:
RALPH KERSEY, DEPARTMENT SCOTLAND COUNTY, DARYL WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLACKMON v. WOODS et al
as 1:2017cv00046
Plaintiff:
SHAWN DEVON BLACKMON
Defendant:
MICHEAL WOODS, MITCH WOODS and RALPH KERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sulyaman Wasalaam v. Christ Young
as 16-7411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SULYAMAN ALISLAM WASALAAM
Defendant - Appellee:
DETECTIVE CHRIST YOUNG, CHIEF DARYL WILLIAMS, SCOTLAND COUNTY AND CITY OF LAURINBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT DETENTION CENTER and others
HUNT v. MILLER et al
as 1:2016cv01214
Plaintiff:
DONALD CRAWFORD HUNT
Defendant:
SANDRA MILLER, LLOYD GOINS, RALPH KERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WASALAAM v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2016cv01068
Plaintiff:
SULYAMAN AL ISLAM WASALAAM
Defendant:
CHRIST YOUNG, DARYL WILLIAMS, SCOTLAND COUNTY AND CITY OF LAURINBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT DETENTION CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
