Dimsdale Jr v. Astrue
William W Dimsdale Jr |
Michael J. Astrue |
1:2008cv00546 |
December 12, 2008 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office |
Alexander |
Lacy Thornburg |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 JUDGMENT. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 3/25/10. (ejb) |
Filing 14 ORDER that, if the Plaintiff wishes to submit further response as to why the Defendants motion for judgment on the pleadings should be denied, he must do so on or before July 31, 2009. Signed by District Judge Lacy Thornburg on 6/30/09. (siw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dimsdale Jr v. Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: William W Dimsdale Jr | |
Represented By: | George C. Piemonte |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.