MESSINA v. Astrue
KRISTIN ANN MESSINA |
Michael J. Astrue |
1:2009cv00368 |
September 24, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Henderson |
Martin Reidinger |
None |
42 U.S.C. ยง 205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 JUDGMENT in favor of Kristin Ann Messina; against Michael J. Astrue and the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is hereby REMANDED to the Commissioner for further administrative action consistent herewith and with the accompanying Memorandum of Decision and Order. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on September 15, 2010. (jhg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: MESSINA v. Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: KRISTIN ANN MESSINA | |
Represented By: | Ervin William Bazzle |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.