Hardy v. Astrue
Carla Hutchinson Hardy |
Michael J. Astrue |
1:2011cv00299 |
November 7, 2011 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Buncombe |
Dennis Howell |
Martin Reidinger |
Disability Insurance |
42 U.S.C. ยง 402 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 2/13/13. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (ejb) |
Filing 35 ORDER and MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION: MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS on 29 MOTION for Summary Judgment - Social Security filed by Carla Hutchinson Hardy, 33 MOTION for Summary Judgment - Social Security < /i> filed by Michael J. Astrue ( Objections to M&R due by 1/22/2013). ORDER striking 27 MOTION To Receive New and Material Evidence and Remand Case and 28 Memorandum in Support of Motion from the record. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 1/4/13. (ejb) |
Filing 25 ORDER Counsel shall have 10 days from entry of this Order to pay a $500.00 sanction into the registry of the Court; upon receipt of the funds, the Court will allow Pltf 20 days from date of payment to file a new Summary J udgment motion; granting in part 23 Joint Motion and Stipulation; granting 24 Motion to Withdraw, and 19 Motion to Disqualify Counsel is terminated (see order for further details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 7/9/12. (ejb) |
Filing 21 ORDER Deft's 19 Partial Objection construed as a Motion to Disqualify Pltf's attorney and on or before 15 days from entry of this Order, Deft shall file a Memorandum of Law in support of such motion; Pltf shall fil e response to Deft's Motion to Disqualify counsel on or before 15 days from filing of Deft's Memorandum of Law, failure to file response will result in disqualification of Pltf's attorney; and 18 Memorandum and Recommendations that this action be dismissed without prejudice is not adopted. Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 5/29/12. (ejb) |
Filing 18 ORDER AND MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION: ORDER striking 16 MOTION for Summary Judgment - Social Security, 17 Memorandum in Support of Motion, 14 MOTION to receive new and material evidence, and 15 Memorandum in Supp ort of Motion, filed by Carla Hutchinson Hardy. MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATIONS the Court RECOMMENDS the District Court DISMISS without prejudice this action. ( Objections to M&R due by 5/7/2012) Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 4/20/12. (ejb) |
Filing 13 ORDER striking 11 MOTION for Summary Judgment and, 12 Memorandum in Support of Motion. Plaintiff allowed twenty (20) days from the entry of this Order to submit a new motion and supporting brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis Howell on 3/22/2012. (pdf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hardy v. Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Carla Hutchinson Hardy | |
Represented By: | V. Lamar Gudger, III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.