Ransom v. Davis et al
| Brian G. Ransom |
| FNU Davis, T. Hamilton and FNU Kizer |
| 1:2019cv00040 |
| February 4, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Frank D Whitney |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. Signed by the Clerk of Court on 03/19/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (ni)
|
|
Filing 7
Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) by Brian G. Ransom (kby)
|
|
Filing 6
AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) re #1 Complaint by Brian G. Ransom (Attachments: #1 Envelope, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Cover Sheet)(kby)
|
|
Filing 5
"Declaration In Support of Motion to Proceed In Former Pauperis" AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Brian G. Ransom. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) (ejb)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Complaint. The filing fee of $400.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Application or Fee due by 3/5/2019. (ejb)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Brian G. Ransom. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support, #2 Envelope) (ejb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against FNU Davis, T. Hamilton, FNU Kizer with Jury Demand, filed by Brian G. Ransom. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ejb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
