Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Sutherland v. Bird et al
as 4:2026cv00664
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutherland
Defendant:
Jeremy Bird, Lea Pence, Sgt. FNU Russ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2026cv00097
Plaintiff:
Earnest J. Matthews
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Capt. FNU Cuba and FNU Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Canastuj Tiu v. Davis et al
as 1:2025cv01933
Plaintiff:
Felipe A. Canastuj Tiu
Defendant:
Sgt. FNU Davis, FNU Taj, FNU Barrientos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palomo-Ortega v. Davis et al
as 1:2025cv00230
Plaintiff:
Juan Palomo-Ortega
Defendant:
FNU Davis and H. Arredondo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowe v. McFadden et al
as 3:2025cv00717
Plaintiff:
James Crowe
Defendant:
FNU Canty, FNU White, FNU Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poloma Ortega v. Davis et al
as 1:2025cv00168
Plaintiff:
Juan Jose Poloma Ortega
Defendant:
FNU Davis and H. Arredondo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waterman (ID 126456) v. Tunnel et al
as 5:2025cv03038
Defendant:
Michelle Tunnel, Centurion, (fnu) Armstrong and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Michael Waterman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor-Jones v. Carroll County Sheriff's Department
as 1:2025cv01026
Plaintiff:
Shelia Taylor-Jones
Defendant:
Carroll County Sheriff's Department, Lucas Cameron Coleman, Officer FNU Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniell v Fuller et al
as 6:2024cv00091
Defendant:
FNU Cooper, Jane Doe #2, David Mercer and others
Plaintiff:
Justin A Daniell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Randolph v. McFadden et al
as 3:2024cv00937
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Truesdale, FNU Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Bernard Randolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
