Whitaker v. State of N.C. et al
Rodney Keith Whitaker |
Sandy Wood, State of N.C., David Street and Kella Phillips |
1:2019cv00230 |
July 29, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Asheville Office |
Frank D Whitney |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER Waiving Initial Partial Filing Fee and Directing Monthly Payments be Made from Prison Account of Rodney Keith Whitaker. Directing correctional facility to transmit payments. Signed by the Clerk of Court on 08/22/2019.(Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(reh) |
Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Sealed - Court) as to Rodney Keith Whitaker, submitted by NCDPS. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (ejb) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. Signed by Clerk of Court on 08/06/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(reh) |
Filing 3 ORDER OF INSTRUCTIONS advising Plaintiff of several essential requirements of proceeding in this Court. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns on 8/6/2019. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (maf) |
Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Rodney Keith Whitaker. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (maf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Rodney Keith Whitaker against State of N.C., Kella Phillips, David Street, and Sandy Wood. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (maf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.