Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Noonsab v. State of N.C.
as 5:2024hc02090
Petitioner:
Somchai Noonsab
Respondent:
State of N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARREN v. WARDEN, DP.S. et al
as 1:2023cv00603
Petitioner:
SEAN DEREK WARREN
Respondent:
WARDEN, DP.S. and D.A.C., STATE OF N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MURPHY v. STATE OF N.C.
as 1:2022cv00973
Petitioner:
JAMES L. MURPHY
Respondent:
STATE OF N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noonsab v. State of N.C.
as 5:2022hc02185
Petitioner:
Somchai Noonsab
Respondent:
State of N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noonsab v. State of N.C.
as 5:2022ct03393
Petitioner:
Somchai Noonsab
Respondent:
State of N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Unknown Name
as 22-7207
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY, a/k/a Tsunami Khan
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN NAME, GOVERNOR STATE OF N.C. and UNKNOWN, US ATTORNEY GENERAL
MURPHY v. STATE OF N.C.
as 1:2022cv00441
Petitioner:
James L. Murphy
Respondent:
STATE OF N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noonsab v. State of N.C.
as 5:2022hc02098
Petitioner:
Somchai Noonsab
Respondent:
State of N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Murphy v. State of N.C.
as 1:2022cv00111
Petitioner:
James L. Murphy
Respondent:
State of N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nicholson v. State of N.C.
as 5:2022hc02059
Petitioner:
Artemus V. Nicholson
Respondent:
State of N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
