Vang v. Catawba Medical Center et al
Pakuja Crystal Vang |
Catawba Medical Center, Catawba Valley Family Medicine Claremont, Bethany Medical Center, Frye Neurology, Emergeortho, Emergeortho Physical Therapy, Lincoln Financial Group, Novant Health Matthews Medical Center, Carolina EMG Specialists, LIncoln Internal Medicine, Cones Internal Medicine, Hickory Social Security Office, OrthoCarolina, OrthoCarolina Orthopedic, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Privia Medical Group, Inovaspine, Inova Neurology, Onehealthmedicalcare, Ortho Virginia, Walmart Pharmacy, Burke County Social Services, The Health Plan, Carefirst, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Anthem Healthkeepers, Bright Healthcare, Healthsmart Pharmacy, SpecOrtho, Moses Cones Sport Medicine Center, Neurology Center, WakeMed Raleigh Campus, DES Central Office, UPS Store, USPS, NC Medical Board and NC Whistle Protection Labor |
1:2023cv00018 |
January 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
W Carleton Metcalf |
Martin Reidinger |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 *Letter MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint, by Pakuja Crystal Vang. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint #1 against Michael O'Neil Waters, #2 Proposed Amended Complaint #2 against Valdese Weaver, #3 Exhibit - Thumb Drive, #4 IFP Application #1 signed 2/21/2023, #5 IFP Application #2 signed 2/22/2023 re: Proposed Amended Complaint #2, #6 IFP Application #3 signed 2/22/2023, #7 IFP Application #4 unsigned, #8 Envelope) (ejb). Modified *text on 3/3/2023 (ejb). |
Filing 4 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Memorandum of Decision and Order dated 2/9/2023. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (ejb) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER that Pltf's #2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED; Pltf's #1 Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and within fourteen (14) days of the entry of this Order, Pltf Pakuja Crystal Vang shall file a single document, not to exceed more than three (3) pages, succinctly explaining why she believes the Court should not impose the above-described pre-filing review system. ( See Order for further details.) Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 2/8/2023. ( Pltf's Response due by 2/23/2023.) (ejb) |
Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Pakuja Crystal Vang. (Attachment: #1 Envelope) (maf) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Pakuja Crystal Vang against Anthem Healthkeepers, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Bethany Medical Center, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of North Carolina, Bright Healthcare, Burke County Social Services, Carefirst, Carolina EMG Specialists, Catawba Medical Center, Catawba Valley Family Medicine Claremont, Cones Internal Medicine, DES Central Office, Emergeortho, Emergeortho Physical Therapy, Frye Neurology, Healthsmart Pharmacy, Hickory Social Security Office, Inova Neurology, Inovaspine, LIncoln Internal Medicine, Lincoln Financial Group, Moses Cones Sport Medicine Center, NC Medical Board, NC Whistle Protection Labor, Neurology Center, Novant Health Matthews Medical Center, Onehealthmedicalcare, Ortho Virginia, OrthoCarolina, OrthoCarolina Orthopedic, Privia Medical Group, SpecOrtho, The Health Plan, UPS Store, USPS, WakeMed Raleigh Campus, and Walmart Pharmacy. (Attachments: #1 Attachments, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Envelope) (maf) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.