Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Amendola v. USP Hazelton
as 5:2026cv00200
Respondent:
Warden USP Hazelton
Petitioner:
Brett A. Amendola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ryan v. USPS Turlock
as 1:2026cv09111
Defendant:
USPS Turlock
Plaintiff:
Natasha J. Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nelson v. United States of America et al
as 3:2026cv03263
Defendant:
USP Canaan Warden and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Robby Nelson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
United States of America v. $49,550.00 United States Currency et al
as 8:2026cv00675
Defendant:
Rolex Datejust Two-tone Jubilee Watch with Pink Diamond Dial, Van Cleef & Arpels Mother of Pearl Pendant Necklace, Forty Two (42) USPS Money Orders Valuing $41,997.00 and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Astin v. USPS
as 1:2026cv00271
Defendant:
USPS
Plaintiff:
Mekell Astin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Aror-Ark O'Diah, et al v. Johnny Walker, III, et al
as 26-5369
Defendant:
NYU Langone Health Pulmonary and Sleep Med Brooklyn, New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, Social Security Administration and others
Plaintiff:
June Iona Bell, Erica Moses and Aror-Ark Ark O'Diah
Edwards v. United States of America, et al.
as 26-7012
Plaintiff:
GEZO EDWARDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN, USP Atwater
DeJanette v. DCF et al
as 3:2026cv02876
Plaintiff:
Chrishanda DeJanette
Defendant:
DCF, Sulzbacher, NYAP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC)Ra El v. Warden, USP Atwater
as 1:2026cv08626
Petitioner:
Hassan Ra El
Respondent:
Warden, USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
DAVIS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2026cv03651
Plaintiff:
RONALD DAVIS
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and USP SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
