Cases 1 - 10 of 3,832
Quezada v. USP Tucson
as 5:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Graciano Pina Quezada
Defendant:
USP Tucson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Matthews v. USP McCreary et al
as 6:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Louis R. Matthews
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Colette Peters, John Gilley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Chambers v. SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dontriel Chambers
Defendant:
SHU Staff at USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Greer v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 5:2024cv00233
Petitioner:
Andrew Greer
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Edwards v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2024cv00234
Petitioner:
Daco Zanquello Edwards
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
American United Transportation Inc. v. USPS et al
as 1:2024cv03278
Plaintiff:
American United Transportation Inc.
Defendant:
USPS and Willie Lee White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
MIKOLAY v. KARNER
as 2:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MIKOLAY
Defendant:
LORI KARNER and USPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
Goodwin v. USP Leavenworth
as 5:2024cv03060
Plaintiff:
Joe Lewis Goodwin
Defendant:
USP Leavenworth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Green v. Warden, USP Canaan
as 1:2024cv00720
Petitioner:
Reginald Edward Green
Respondent:
Warden USP Canaan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s
D'Andre Brown v. FBOP, et al
as 24-5403
Plaintiff:
D'ANDRE ROLAND BROWN
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JOHN DOE #1, being sued as "Lieutenant" USP McCreary, JOHN DOE #2, being sued as "Lieutenant" USP McCreary and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
