Pippinger v. Buncombe County Government Employees et al
| Jonathan Daniel Pippinger |
| Buncombe County Government Employees, FNU LNU, Central Medical Industries & Medidex and Dynamic Mobile Imaging |
| 1:2023cv00348 |
| December 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Prisoner Admin Remedy Statement by Jonathan Daniel Pippinger. (Attachments: #1 Grievance, #2 Envelope) (smm) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Prisoner Trust Account Statement of Plaintiff. Signed by Clerk, Katherine Hord Simon. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (smm)
|
|
Standing Order of Instructions Regarding Pro Se Prisoner Civil Actions. Click on this link to retrieve the #Standing Order. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 12/11/2023. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (cly)
|
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Jonathan Daniel Pippinger. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Buncombe County Government Employees, FNU LNU (D.A., Buncombe County Courts), FNU LNU (Buncombe County Jail Classification at Buncombe Couty Detention Center), Central Medical Industries & Medidex, Dynamic Mobile Imaging, filed by Jonathan Daniel Pippinger. (Attachments: #1 Note re Discovery Material, #2 Envelope) (cly) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
