Torres v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division et al
| Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres |
| North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis, Douglas Newton, Toni L. Banks, Eric Wilson, Thomas Hamilton, Mark Stancil, Jesse Clark and Micheal Cheek |
| 1:2024cv00112 |
| April 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Prisoner Petitions: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (smm) |
| Filing 2 AFFIDAVIT - 1983 Application IFP (Sealed - Participants) by Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cly) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis, Douglas Newton, Toni L. Banks, Eric Wilson, Thomas Hamilton, Mark Stancil, Jesse Clark, Micheal Cheek with Jury Demand, filed by Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (cly) |
Standing Order of Instructions Regarding Pro Se Prisoner Civil Actions. Click on this link to retrieve the #Standing Order. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 4/12/2024. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (cly)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
