Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Torres v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Torres v. Coffee et al
as 1:2021cv00157
Defendant:
FNU Coffee, FNU Ingram and Ben Carver
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Torres v. Nathan Ball
as 21-6447
Defendant / Appellee:
NATHAN BALL, Sergeant, Buncombe County Sheriff Office, individual capacity, TIMOTHY R. TAYLOR, Deputy, Buncombe County Sheriff Office, individual capacity and DANE R. ONDERDONK, Deputy, Buncombe County Sheriff Office, individual capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN ANTHONY LEE TORRES
Torres v. Ishee, et al
as 1:2021cv00068
Defendant:
Mark Ervin, Greg Swink, FNU Bullis and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Dye et al
as 5:2020cv00164
Defendant:
FNU Clawson, FNU Brown, Russell Chester and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Ball et al
as 1:2019cv00094
Defendant:
Dane R. Onderdonk, Nathan Ball and Timothy R. Taylor
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Torres v. Ball et al
as 1:2018cv00359
Defendant:
Dane R. Onderdonk, Nathan Ball and T. R. Taylor
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Torres v. Davis
as 1:2018cv00314
Defendant:
FNU Davis
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony-Lee Torres and Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Torres v. USA
as 1:2012cv00291
Petitioner:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00277
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
