Cordulack v. The Wal-Mart Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Christoper Donald Cordulack
Defendant: FNU LNU, Assoc. Fiduciary Corporations, Walmart Board and The Wal-Mart Corporation
Case Number: 1:2024cv00239
Filed: September 13, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina
Presiding Judge: W Carleton Metcalf
Referring Judge: Martin Reidinger
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 24, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that the Plaintiff's #2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs is DENIED. The Plaintiff shall have thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order within which to pay the required filing fee. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiffs Complaint [Doc. 1] is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Filing Fee due by 10/24/2024). Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 9/23/2024. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(kby)
September 16, 2024 Standing Order Regarding Use of Artificial Intelligence (3:24-mc-104). Click on this link to retrieve the #Standing Order. Plaintiff received this over the counter. (smm)
September 16, 2024 Standing Order of Instructions Regarding Pro Se Litigants in Civil Actions. Click on this link to retrieve the #Standing Order. Plaintiff received this over the counter. (smm)
September 13, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION (Sealed - Participants) to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christoper Donald Cordulack. (smm). Motions referred to W. Carleton Metcalf.
September 13, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT filed by Christoper Donald Cordulack against Assoc. Fiduciary Corporations, FNU LNU(Walmart CEO), FNU LNU(said "Store Manager", Walmart), The Wal-Mart Corporation, Walmart Board. (smm)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the North Carolina Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cordulack v. The Wal-Mart Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christoper Donald Cordulack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FNU LNU
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Assoc. Fiduciary Corporations
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Wal-Mart Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?