Rogers v. Astrue
| Joyce A. Rogers |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| 2:2011cv00058 |
| December 28, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Bryson City Office |
| Macon |
| Dennis Howell |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Supplemental Security Income |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
20
ORDER granting 18 Joint Motion for Attorney Fees, as amended 19 . Signed by District Judge Martin Reidinger on 9/22/12. (ejb)
|
|
Filing
17
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 08/20/2012. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns on 08/20/2012. (thh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rogers v. Astrue | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joyce A. Rogers | |
| Represented By: | Charlotte Williams Hall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
