Sharpe v. Astrue
Martha Sharpe |
Michael J. Astrue |
3:2009cv00101 |
March 11, 2009 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI Office |
Mecklenburg |
Robert J. Conrad |
David Keesler |
None |
U.S. Government Defendant |
42:405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER granting 18 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 5/1/2013. (eef) |
Filing 17 ORDER denying without prejudice 15 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/2/2013. (eef) |
Filing 14 CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff in accordance with the Court's Order of 9/30/09. Signed by Frank G. Johns on 9/30/09. (gpb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Sharpe v. Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Martha Sharpe | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Lee Fowler Lunn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.