Smith v. Pollino et al
Christopher P. Smith |
Joseph Pollino, Jamie Lein, Robert Marcolese, Village of Marvin, Jon Jones and Michael Lavelle |
3:2019cv00639 |
November 22, 2019 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Kenneth D Bell |
David Keesler |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 Certificate of Settlement Conference. Results: unable to resolve by Jon Jones, Michael Lavelle, Joseph Pollino. (Perrin, Sean) Modified text on 1/16/2020 (tmg). |
Filing 21 MEMORANDUM in Support re #20 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Jon Jones, Michael Lavelle, Joseph Pollino. (Perrin, Sean) |
Filing 20 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Jon Jones, Michael Lavelle, Joseph Pollino. Responses due by 1/29/2020 (Perrin, Sean). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 19 Notice of Substitution of Counsel by Sean F. Perrin on behalf of Michael Lavelle, Joseph Pollino, Jon Jones, Attorney John Robert Buric terminated. (Perrin, Sean) |
Filing 18 ORDER granting #17 Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #13 MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , and MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction . Plaintiff shall have up to and including February 5, 2020 to file his brief in response to the motions to dismiss of Defendants Lein, Marcolese, and the Village Responses due by 2/5/2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 1/13/20. (mga) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #13 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction , #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Christopher P. Smith. Responses due by 1/27/2020 (Caudill, Bo). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 16 MEMORANDUM in Support re #15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Jamie Lein, Robert Marcolese. (Henriques, Mark) |
Filing 15 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Jamie Lein, Robert Marcolese. Responses due by 1/22/2020 (Henriques, Mark). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support re #13 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Village of Marvin. (Santaniello, Andrew) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Village of Marvin. Responses due by 1/14/2020 (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Exhibit Insurance Policy)(Santaniello, Andrew). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Defendant Michael Lavelle's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Defendant Michael Lavelle shall have up to and including January 27, 2020 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/27/19. (mga) |
Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Plaintiff's Complaint by Michael Lavelle. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Buric, John). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Defendants Joseph Pollino and Jon Jones' Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Defendants Joesph Pollino and Jon Jones shall have up to and including January 15, 2020 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/23/19. (mga) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Jon Jones, Joseph Pollino. (Perrin, Sean). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew James Santaniello on behalf of Village of Marvin (Santaniello, Andrew) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Defendants Robert Marcolese and Jamie Lein's Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Defendnats Jamie Lein and Robert Marcolese shall have up to and including January 8, 2020 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 12/13/19. (mga) |
Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint by Jamie Lein, Robert Marcolese. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Henriques, Mark). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Anthony Ingersoll on behalf of Jamie Lein, Robert Marcolese (Ingersoll, Michael) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark Peter Henriques on behalf of Jamie Lein, Robert Marcolese (Henriques, Mark) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by John Robert Buric on behalf of Michael Lavelle (Buric, John) |
Case reassigned to District Judge Kenneth D. Bell and Magistrate Judge David Keesler. Senior Judge Graham Mullen no longer assigned to the case. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(eef) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (ctb) |
Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(ctb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4272609), filed by Christopher P. Smith.(Caudill, Bo) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.