Cases 1 - 10 of 14
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv26019
Plaintiff:
JON JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
D.S. v. Gallatin County Board of Education et al
as 2:2020cv00167
Defendant:
Principal Jon Jones, Andy E. Jones, Gallatin County Board of Education and others
Plaintiff:
D.S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv90049
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JON JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv08148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv03459
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
JON JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Pollino et al
as 3:2019cv00639
Plaintiff:
Christopher P. Smith
Defendant:
Joseph Pollino, Jamie Lein, Robert Marcolese and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIVINE et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03135
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK RUFO, NATHANIEL RENTZ, DAVID CUNNINGHAM and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Divine et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02104
Plaintiff:
Dominick Rufo, Nathaniel Rentz, David Cunningham and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Womack v. Polk Co. Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv00258
Plaintiff:
Dolly Womack
Defendant:
Polk Co. Police Department, Roger Mavis, Brice Sherfesee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00086
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc, Telstra, and Telstra Ventures Group, Alphabet Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Smith and Michael Henry Smith
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
