Brown v. Belk, Inc., et al
| LaRon Brown |
| Belk, Inc. and Chanel |
| 3:2020cv00025 |
| January 16, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Graham Mullen |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Belk, Inc.. (Rice, Akya) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Belk, Inc.. Responses due by 3/9/2020 (Rice, Akya) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Belk, Inc. answer due 2/24/2020.. Entered by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on January 21, 2020. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(DC)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Notice of Removal, by Belk, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Rice, Akya) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Belk, Inc. (Rice, Akya) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Mecklenburg, case number 19-cvs-23249. (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4345900), filed by Belk, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal)(Rice, Akya) |
| Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(ctb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
