Cases 1 - 10 of 100
DOKES v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 1:2026cv11819
Plaintiff:
CHANELLE DOKES
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2026cv02027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Summers v. Trustaff Travel Nurses, LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00859
Plaintiff:
Chanel Summers
Defendant:
Trustaff Travel Nurses, LLC and Bon Secours St. Francis Medical Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Lindsey v. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv08998
Plaintiff:
Chanel Lateauna Lindsey
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Chanel, Inc. v. prettybagsforher.co
as 1:2026cv25373
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
prettybagsforher.co
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Chanel, Inc. v. leoluxury.ru
as 1:2026cv25372
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
leoluxury.ru
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Chanel, Inc. v. cocokickk.com
as 1:2026cv25374
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
cocokickk.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Chanel, Inc. v. Yourluxury77.com
as 1:2026cv25370
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
yourluxury77.com
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Garcia et al v. Rosado et al
as 1:2026cv06715
Plaintiff:
Chanel Garcia, Argenis Betanco, Linpeng Gao and others
Defendant:
Rossana Rosado, Stephanie Russell, Stephanie Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
