Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Sherman v. Merrillville The Town of et al
as 2:2023cv00429
Plaintiff:
Chanel Sherman
Defendant:
Merrillville The Town of, Jesus Solis, R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv14817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Brown v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation; et al
as 1:2023cv11262
Plaintiff:
Chanel Brown
Defendant:
Revlon Consumer Products Corporation;, Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Revlon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Taylor v. Revlon, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv08756
Plaintiff:
Chanel Taylor
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc., Revlon Consumer Products Corporation,, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv50377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Dickerson v. Milwaukee County et al
as 2:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
Travis Dickerson
Defendant:
Milwaukee County, Earl Lucas, Milwaukee County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Illinois Disbursement Unit
as 3:2022cv00145
Plaintiff:
Chanel Charda Baker
Defendant:
Illinois Disbursement Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vargas v. Gomez et al
as 1:2021cv05421
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Vargas
Defendant:
David Gomez, Marcus Hardy, Quentin Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
