Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Parran v. Capital One Auto Finance et al
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Quantilia Chanel Parran
Defendant:
Capital One Auto Finance and Koons Chevrolet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Midland National Life Insurance Company v. Flowers et al
as 8:2022cv03267
Plaintiff:
Midland National Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Chanelle Flowers and Quartni Aquatika Kazmik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02730
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
White et al v. The ADT Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv03316
Plaintiff:
Jai'-La Armstrong, Chanel White, Jacob White and others
Defendant:
THE ADT CORPORATION, ADT LLC dba ADT SECURITY SERVICES and ADT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
White et al v. THE ADT CORPORATION et al
as 1:2019cv03315
Plaintiff:
Chanel White and Jacob White
Defendant:
THE ADT CORPORATION, ADT, LLC dba ADT SECURITY SERVICES, Jael White and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parker v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2017cv03310
Plaintiff:
Chanell G. Parker
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Williams v. Montgomery County Maryland et al
as 8:2015cv00025
Plaintiff:
Chanel Williams
Defendant:
Montgomery County Maryland and Egon Lawrence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chanel, Inc. v. Cherif
as 8:2014cv03876
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Umu Cherif and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel, Inc. v. Watkins et al
as 8:2014cv03864
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Kevin Andrew Watkins, Betterview Merchandise, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
COLEMAN et al v. TUZON et al
as 8:2012cv03801
Plaintiff:
KEON COLEMAN and CHANEL CRYER
Defendant:
YVETTE TUZON , U.S. Office of Personnel Management and United States of |America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
