Celgard, LLC v. Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. et al
Celgard, LLC |
Dr. Xiaomin Zhang, Global Venture Development, LLC, Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd., Sun Town Technology, Inc., Bin Wang, Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. (US) Research Institute, Global Venture Development, Inc. and Steven Zhang |
3:2020cv00130 |
March 2, 2020 |
US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
Graham Mullen |
Other Statutory Actions |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #13 MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTED SERVICE by Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd., Xiaomin Zhang. Replies due by 5/5/2020 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, Senior Website Timeline, #2 Exhibit 2, N.D.Cal. Order, #3 Exhibit 3, China Judicial Assistance Information)(Wilkerson, David) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by Kathryn Gusmer Cole on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Cole, Kathryn) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #13 MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTED SERVICE. Response due by 4/28/2020. Entered by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 4/10/2020. (Prichard, Daniel) |
Filing 17 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re: #13 MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTED SERVICE by Global Venture Development, Inc., Global Venture Development, LLC, Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. (US) Research Institute, Sun Town Technology, Inc.. Responses due by 4/22/2020 (Wilkerson, David) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Wilkerson on behalf of Global Venture Development, Inc., Global Venture Development, LLC, Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. (US) Research Institute, Sun Town Technology, Inc. (Wilkerson, David) |
TEXT-ONLY ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Global Venture Development, Inc. answer due 5/28/2020; Global Venture Development, LLC answer due 5/28/2020; Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. (US) Research Institute answer due 5/28/2020; Sun Town Technology, Inc. answer due 5/28/2020. Entered by Senior Judge Graham Mullen on 4/1/2020. (Prichard, Daniel) |
Filing 15 RESPONSE to Motion re #12 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint, by Celgard, LLC. Replies due by 4/7/2020 (Wilson, J.) |
Filing 14 MEMORANDUM in Support re #13 MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTED SERVICE by Celgard, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Wheeler Email Chain, #2 Exhibit California Case DE 17, #3 Exhibit California Case DE 30, #4 Exhibit California Case DE 36, #5 Exhibit Zhang's Charlotte Property, #6 Exhibit USPTO Certified Assignment, #7 Proposed Order)(Wilson, J.) |
Filing 13 MOTION FOR SUBSTITUTED SERVICE by Celgard, LLC. Responses due by 4/14/2020 (Wilson, J.) |
Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re: #1 Complaint, by Global Venture Development, Inc., Global Venture Development, LLC, Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. (US) Research Institute, Sun Town Technology, Inc.. (McDevitt, Larry) |
Filing 11 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Celgard, LLC. Sun Town Technology, Inc. served on 3/12/2020, answer due 4/2/2020. (Wilson, J.) |
Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Celgard, LLC. Xiaomin Zhang served on 3/12/2020, answer due 4/2/2020. (Wilson, J.) |
Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Celgard, LLC. Global Venture Development, Inc. served on 3/12/2020, answer due 4/2/2020. (Wilson, J.) |
Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Celgard, LLC. Global Venture Development, LLC served on 3/12/2020, answer due 4/2/2020. (Wilson, J.) |
Filing 7 Summons Reissued Electronically as to Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd., Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. (US) Research Institute. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(brl) |
Filing 6 Summons Reissued Electronically as to Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. (US) Research Institute. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(mga) |
Filing 5 Summons Reissued Electronically as to Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd.. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. (brl) |
Filing 4 Summons Reissued Electronically as to Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd., Xiaomin Zhang. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Xiaomin Zhang)(brl) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued Electronically as to All Defendants. NOTICE: Counsel shall print the summons and serve with other case opening documents in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P.4 . (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons)(brj) |
Case assigned to Senior Judge Graham Mullen. Notice: You must click this link to retrieve the #Case Assignment Packet. This is your only notice - you will not receive a separate document.(brj) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Celgard, LLC (Wilson, J.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0419-4408903), filed by Celgard, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Translated Chinese Article from WCLF, #2 Exhibit 2 - NDCA Redacted Trade Secret Statement, #3 Exhibit 3 - Senior-China Trademark Registration and Application, #4 Exhibit 4 - Text Messages from Senior)(Wilson, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.