Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Celgard, LLC v. Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. et al
as 4:2022cv00594
Defendant:
Dr. Xiaomin Zhang, Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd., Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. (US) Research Institute and others
Plaintiff:
Celgard, LLC
In re: Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd.
as 22-115
Petitioner:
In re: SHENZHEN SENIOR TECHNOLOGY MATERIAL CO. LTD. and XIAOMIN (STEVEN) ZHANG
Respondent:
CELGARD, LLC
Celgard LLC v. Targray Technology International Inc
as 8:2020mc00128
Respondent:
Targray Technology International Inc
Petitioner:
Celgard LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd.
Celgard, LLC v. Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. et al
as 3:2020cv00130
Defendant:
Dr. Xiaomin Zhang, Global Venture Development, LLC, Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Celgard, LLC
Celgard, LLC v. Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. (US) Research Institute et al
as 4:2019cv05784
Plaintiff:
Celgard, LLC
Defendant:
Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. and Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co. Ltd. (US) Research Institute
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Celgard, LLC v. Targray Technology International Inc.
as 5:2019cv02401
Plaintiff:
Celgard, LLC
Defendant:
Targray Technology International Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Celgard, LLC v. MTI Corporation
as 3:2018cv00656
Defendant:
MTI Corporation
Plaintiff:
Celgard, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Celgard, LLC v. MTI Corporation
as 5:2018cv07441
Defendant:
MTI Corporation
Plaintiff:
Celgard, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
