Caldwell v. USA
| USA2255Group |
| Gilbert Garrille Caldwell |
| USA |
| 5:2011cv00081 |
| June 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Statesville Office |
| Caldwell |
| Richard Voorhees |
| Motions to Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER granting 1 2255 Petition. Petitioner shall be resentenced in accordance with this Order. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 6/18/15. (smj) Modified on 6/18/2015 to change docket text. Regenerated NEF. (smj).
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER re 20 Order granting motion to remand- USCA, 21 Mandate - USCA - ordering the government to file a memorandum supporting its position on remand. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 6/23/14. (smj)
|
|
Filing
14
CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 1/3/2013. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns. (cbb)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER that petitioner shall have until 11/13/12 to file a response to re 8 Respondent's MOTION to Dismiss Petitioner's 28 U.S.C. Section 2255 Motion. Petitioner's responses due by 11/13/2012. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 10/23/12. (smj)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER re 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255). It is ordered that no later than 40 days from the Fourth Circuit's decision in US v. Simmons, No. 08-4475, the US Atty shall file an Answer to petr's Mot/Vacate. Signed by District Judge Richard Voorhees on 8/9/2011. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(cbb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
