Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Spurlock v. USA
as 5:2024cv00264
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Zebulon James Spurlock
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mike v. USA
as 3:2024cv00888
Petitioner:
Joseph Mike
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Jackson v. USA
as 3:2024cv00789
Petitioner:
Walter Bavon Jackson
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00741
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Arriaga v. USA
as 3:2024cv00384
Petitioner:
Angel Arriaga
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dalton v. USA
as 5:2024cv00090
Petitioner:
Physique Dalton
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Azar El v. Cabarrus County Jail et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussem Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs, Angel Gonzalez and others
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Walker v. USA
as 5:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Ashley Dawn Walker
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Martell v. USA
as 3:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Catina Lynn Martell
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Poole v. USA
as 3:2024cv00052
Petitioner:
Michael Lamont Poole
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
