Ayers v. Crisp
| William J. Ayers |
| Joshua Crisp |
| USA2255Group |
| 5:2022cv00110 |
| August 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Martin Reidinger |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT is hereby entered in accordance with the Court's Order dated 9/29/2022. Signed by Clerk, Frank G. Johns on 9/29/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (hms) |
Filing 5
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this action. The Clerk is also respectfully instructed to mail the Petitioner a blank 2254 form and a copy of this Order. Signed by Chief Judge Martin Reidinger on 9/29/2022. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.) (hms)
|
| Filing 4 Letter from Willie Jason Ayers (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(brl) |
| Filing 3 Pro Se Letter from William J. Ayers (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(tlj) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY regarding #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. The filing fee of $5.00 was not received or application to proceed without payment of fees and affidavit was not submitted. Application or Fee due by 9/1/2022. (tlj) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241, filed by William J. Ayers. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tlj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
