Russell v. Rice et al
| Herbert P. Russell |
| Fred Rice and William D. West doing business as Klassic Rides, LLC |
| 5:2024cv00019 |
| January 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina |
| Kenneth D Bell |
| David Keesler |
| Contract: Other |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 PSAP Opt In/Out Form mailed to Pro Se Litigant. PSAP Response due by 3/19/2024 (mek) |
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by William D. West dba Klassic Rides, LLC. (Austin, Carol) Modified text on 3/5/2024 (mek). |
| Filing 12 Disclosure Statement of Citizenship of Party or Intervenor by William D. West. (Austin, Carol) |
| Filing 11 Disclosure Statement of Citizenship of Party or Intervenor by Fred Rice. (Austin, Carol) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Initial Settlement Conference by Fred Rice re #9 Answer to Complaint (Austin, Carol) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand and Motion to Dismiss by Fred Rice, William D. West. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Austin, Carol) Modified on 3/5/2024 to add filer (mek). |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Unavailability of Carol Austin by Fred Rice (Austin, Carol) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting Defendant's #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. Fred Rice answer due 3/4/2024; William D. West answer due 3/4/2024. Signed by US Magistrate Judge David Keesler on 2/9/24. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mga)
|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint by Fred Rice, William D. West. (Austin, Carol). Motions referred to David Keesler. |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATES OF SERVICE by Herbert P. Russell re #3 Affidavit of Service, #4 Affidavit of Service (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(mek) |
| Filing 4 Proof/AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Herbert P. Russell. Fred Rice served on 1/22/2024, answer due 2/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(mek) |
| Filing 3 Proof/AFFIDAVIT of Service filed by Herbert P. Russell. William D. West served on 1/22/2024, answer due 2/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(mek) |
| Filing Fee Received: $ 405, receipt number 7812 (tlj) |
|
Standing Order of Instructions Regarding Pro Se Litigants in Civil Actions. Click on this link to retrieve the #Standing Order. Signed by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 1/19/2024. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mek)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued Conventionally as to Fred Rice, William D. West. (mek) |
| Filing 1 Pro Se COMPLAINT against Fred Rice, William D. West with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 405), filed by Herbert P. Russell. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summonses) (mek) |
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Case Assignment Packet. The document was served conventionally at case filing (mek) |
|
TEXT-ONLY ORDER: The Clerk of Court is directed to issue the proposed summons at Doc. No. 1-2 in this matter. It is further directed that the time to effectuate service is extended to 90 days from this date of this Order. Plaintiff is advised that they are responsible for making sure that service is effected properly pursuant to the Rules of Civil Procedure. So Ordered. Entered by District Judge Kenneth D. Bell on 1/18/2024. (Pro se litigant served by US Mail.)(mek)
|
| Clerk's Entry and Service of #Standing Order Requiring an Initial Settlement Conference in Civil Cases assigned to the Honorable Kenneth D. Bell (5:19-mc-5 (Doc. No. 1)). The order was served conventionally. The filing party is directed to serve a copy of the Order with service. (mek) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
