Jones v. Avon Local School District Board of Education et al
Monique Jones |
Avon Local School District Board of Education, Jason Call, Loretta Oley and Kimberly Fuller |
1:2016cv02805 |
November 17, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Lorain |
Patricia A. Gaughan |
Other Civil Rights |
29 U.S.C. ยง 754 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 34 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion to Postpone and Limit the Scope of Oral Examination of C.H. (Doc. 30 ). The motion is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART as set forth herein. The Court has reviewed the motion and finds that, in large part, it is not well-taken. The Court ORDERS that the deposition shall proceed as scheduled at the office of plaintiff's counsel. The Court will, however, limit the deposition to three ho urs, excluding any time taken for reasonable breaks. In addition, C.H. will be permitted to request reasonable breaks within that three-hour time frame, provided no question is pending. The motion is DENIED in all other respects. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 8/16/17. (LC,S) |
Filing 23 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: Defendants Kimberly Fuller and Psych & Psych's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint is granted. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 2/22/17. (LC,S) re 12 |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.