Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Jones v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Lanekia Monique Jones
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Clint Hickman and Dawn Noggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02827
Plaintiff:
SHAVON MONIQUE JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv13237
Plaintiff:
MONIQUE JONES
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv23639
Plaintiff:
Shakelia Monique Jones
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv11194
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and TIFFANY MONIQUE JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv00654
Plaintiff:
Tynequa Monique Jones
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv50032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Berry v. Jones
as 3:2021cv00032
Defendant:
Jasmine Monique Jones
Plaintiff:
Terry Berry
Interested Party:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Indiana Department of Child Services et al
as 3:2020cv00674
Defendant:
Mery Beth Bonaventura, Indiana Department of Child Services Workers, Suntana L Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Iredell Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
