Riverside San Bernardino County Indian Health, Inc. v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
Riverside San Bernardino County Indian Health, Inc. |
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., Mallinckrodt LLC, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt PLC, Insys Therapeutics Inc., Watson Laboratories Inc., Allergan PLC, Cardinal Health Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., H. D. Smith Holding Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Actavis LLC, Cephalon Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc., Walgreen Co., Allergan Finance LLC, Endo Health Solutions Inc., Miami-Luken Inc, Walmart Inc., Johnson and Johnson, CVS Health Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, H. D. Smith Holdings, LLC, Noramco Inc, H. D. Smith, LLC, Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and Purdue Pharma Inc. |
1:2019op45025 |
January 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Dan Aaron Polster (MDL 2804) |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1961 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 Amended complaint Short Form against All Defendants and adding new party defendant(s) SpecGX LLC Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. West-Ward Pharmaceuticals Corp. Thrifty Payless, Inc. Beverly Sackler David A. Sackler Ilene Sackler Lefcourt Jonathan D. Sackler Kathe A. Sackler Mortimer D. A. Sackler Richard S. Sackler Theresa Sackler Stuart Baker Raymond Sackler Trust Rhodes Pharmaceuticals Inc. Rhodes Pharmaceuticals L. P. Rhodes Technologies Rhodes Technologies Inc. P.F. Laboratories, Inc.. Filed by Riverside San Bernardino County Indian Health, Inc.. (Hanly, Paul) |
Filing 11 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Central. Case number 5:19-cv-00005. Original file, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
Filing 10 Conditional Transfer Order - 75 from the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2804, transferring case to USDC, Northern District of Ohio and assigned to Honorable Dan A. Polster. Case transferred electronically. MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (twdb) [Transferred from cacd on 1/23/2019.] |
Filing 9 STANDING ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Jesus G. Bernal. (ima) [Transferred from cacd on 1/23/2019.] |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE - RESPONSE filed by Plaintiff Riverside San Bernardino County Indian Health, Inc.. (Williams, Scott) [Transferred from cacd on 1/23/2019.] |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1 Civil Cover Sheet should have been e-filed separately and in the correct event category. The event is located under Civil Events Other Filings Miscellaneous Filings. No further action is required unless the Court so directs. (car) [Transferred from cacd on 1/23/2019.] |
Filing 6 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Scott W. Williams. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) [Transferred from cacd on 1/23/2019.] |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Paul J Hanly, Jr. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (car) [Transferred from cacd on 1/23/2019.] |
Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) [Transferred from cacd on 1/23/2019.] |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (car) [Transferred from cacd on 1/23/2019.] |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff All Plaintiffs, (Foley, Crystal) [Transferred from cacd on 1/23/2019.] |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-22977242 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY INDIAN HEALTH, INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Attorney Crystal Gayle Foley added to party RIVERSIDE-SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY INDIAN HEALTH, INC.(pty:pla))(Foley, Crystal) [Transferred from cacd on 1/23/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.