Innovative Sports Management, Inc. v. Gresham et al
| Innovative Sports Management, Inc. |
| Brian Gresham and Giant Step Inc. |
| 1:2020cv00501 |
| March 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Giant Step Inc., Brian Gresham. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (L,MI) |
| Filing 3 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Copyright (AO121) filed by Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media. (Lonstein, Julie) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Innovative Sports Management, Inc. d/b/a Integrated Sports Media. (Lonstein, Julie) |
| Filing 1 Complaint against Giant Step Inc., Brian Gresham. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number AOHNDC-9836777. Filed by Innovative Sports Management, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint - Advertisement, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons as to Brian Gresham, #4 Summons as to Giant Step, Inc.) (Lonstein, Julie) |
| Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (L,MI) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge William H. Baughman, Jr. (L,MI) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
