Singh et al v. United States of America et al
| Ranjit Singh and Kristine Singh |
| Chad Wolf, Mark Hansen, United States of America, Mark Koumans, William Barr and Karyn Zarlenga |
| 1:2020cv00799 |
| April 14, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Pamela A Barker |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 2
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon William Barr, Mark Hansen, Mark Koumans, Chad Wolf, Karyn Zarlenga. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (B,R)
|
|
Filing 1
Complaint against William Barr, Mark Hansen, Mark Koumans, United States of America, Chad Wolf, Karyn Zarlenga. Filing fee paid. $400.00. Receipt # 14660122639 Plaintiff has indicated that case may be related to pending civil action 1:20mc39. Filed by Kristine Singh, Ranjit Singh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit List, #2 Exhibit A- H. Newrones Affidavit, #3 Exhibit B- USCIS I-130 Decision, #4 Exhibit C- K.Sigh's Brief in Support of Appeal, #5 Exhibit D- DHS Response to Appeal, #6 Exhibit E- BIA Decision, #7 Civil Cover Sheet, #8 Summons) (B,R)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (B,R)
|
|
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case, (B,R)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
