Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01575
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Zhumalieva v. Bondi et al
as 1:2026cv01137
Plaintiff:
Kutmanai Zhumalieva
Defendant:
Pamela Bondi, Kristi Noem, Joseph B. Edlow and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Peng v. Edlow et al
as 1:2026cv00857
Plaintiff:
Dai Peng
Defendant:
Joseph B. Edlow, Kristi Noem, Mark Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kurmanaly v. Bondi et al
as 1:2025cv14707
Plaintiff:
Mairam Kurmanaly
Defendant:
Pamela Bondi, Kristi Noem, Joseph B. Edlow and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mann v. Chicago Title Insurance Company et al
as 1:2025cv10109
Plaintiff:
David Mann
Defendant:
Chicago Title Insurance Company, Castle Law Firm, LLC, Castle Title Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv07380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jumma v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv13122
Plaintiff:
Wessal Jumma
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Mark Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12664
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv12573
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
