Gridley IP LLC v. Doordash, Inc.
| Gridley IP LLC |
| Doordash, Inc. |
| 1:2021cv00699 |
| March 30, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James S Gwin |
| Patent |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Report on the Determination [Closing] of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120). (Attachments: #1 Order)(W,Na) |
Filing 9
Order of Case Dismissal signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/19/2021. The Court approves voluntary dismissal without prejudice. re #8 (S,KM)
|
| Filing 8 Notice of Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) without Prejudice filed by Gridley IP LLC. (Wernow, Howard) |
|
Order [non-document] entered by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/10/2021 granting Motion for appearance pro hac vice by attorney David E. Dahlquist for Doordash, Inc.. Local Rule 5.1(c) requires that attorneys register for NextGen CM/ECF and file and receive all documents electronically. NextGen CM/ECF registration can be done online at www.pacer.gov. Login with your PACER credentials, go to the Maintenance tab, click Attorney Admissions/E-File Registration, select Ohio Northern District Court and then select Pro Hac Vice. If you were previously granted pro hac vice status and are already registered to file electronically, it is not necessary to register again. (Related Doc #7 )(S,KM)
|
| Filing 7 Motion for attorney David E. Dahlquist to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-10822749, filed by Defendant Doordash, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Certificate of Good Standing)(Dahlquist, David) |
|
Order [non-document] entered by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/4/2021 granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer until June 21, 2021 to answer. (S,KM)
|
| Notice to Attorney David E. Dahlquist. The Court finds no record of your being admitted to practice in the Northern District of Ohio. Pursuant to LR 83.5, an Application for Admission to Practice or a Motion to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice in this case must be filed within 10 business days. The local rules and the attorney admission application are available on the court's web site at: www.ohnd.uscourts.gov. If you are not the attorney of record in this case, a Motion to Withdraw as Attorney pursuant to LR 83.9 must be filed within 10 business days. (O,K) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until June 21, 2021 to answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint filed by Defendant Doordash, Inc.. Related document(s) #5 , #1 . (Dahlquist, David) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Doordash, Inc. on 4/14/2021, filed on behalf of Gridley IP LLC. Related document(s) #4 . (L,Br) |
| Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Doordash, Inc. placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7020 0090 0001 4429 0660. (L,MI) |
| Filing 4 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Doordash, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,MT) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Gridley IP LLC. (Wernow, Howard) |
| Filing 2 Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (AO120) filed by Gridley IP LLC. (Wernow, Howard) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Doordash, Inc. Filing fee paid $402.00, Receipt number AOHNDC-10749760. Filed by Gridley IP LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-US8676668, #2 Exhibit B-US9852435, #3 Exhibit C-'668 Claim Chart, #4 Exhibit D-'435 Claim Chart, #5 Civil Cover Sheet, #6 Summons) (Wernow, Howard) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (M,MT) |
| This action has been identified as a Patent Case that is subject to the Local Patent Rules. Link to #Local Patent Rules. (M,MT) |
| Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (M,MT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gridley IP LLC v. Doordash, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Doordash, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David E. Dahlquist |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gridley IP LLC | |
| Represented By: | Howard L. Wernow |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
