Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen |
Norfolk Southern Railway Company |
1:2021cv01866 |
September 30, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Pamela A Barker |
David A Ruiz |
Labor: Railway Labor Act |
45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 38 Joint Motion for extension of Discovery Cut Off, Stipulations, and Summary Judgment Briefing until 90 days from current deadlines filed by Plaintiff Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. (Petroff, Dimitre) |
Filing 37 Agreed Limited Protective Order regarding confidential documents #36 . Judge David A. Ruiz on 7/31/2023. (H,Z) |
Filing 36 Proposed Order for Agreed Limited Protective Order filed by Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. (Petroff, Dimitre) |
![]() |
Filing 35 Joint Motion for extension of Discovery and Related Deadlines until 8/14/2023 & 60 days for related deadlines filed by Plaintiff Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. (Petroff, Dimitre) |
![]() |
Filing 34 Motion by John B. Lewis to withdraw as counsel filed by Counter-Claimant Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Lewis, John) |
![]() |
Filing 33 Joint Motion for extension of Discovery and Related Deadlines until 6/13/2023 & 60 days for Related Deadlines filed by Plaintiff Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. (Petroff, Dimitre) |
![]() |
Filing 32 Joint Motion for a 60 day extension of discovery and summary judgment deadlines filed by Plaintiff Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. (Petroff, Dimitre) |
![]() |
Filing 31 Joint Motion for extension of Discovery until January 30, 2023 filed by Counter-Claimant Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Related document(s) #29 . (Lewis, John) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 28 Jointly Proposed Schedule filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Related document(s) #27 .(Lewis, John) |
Filing 27 Minute Order of Case Management Conference held on 6/16/2022. Jointly Proposed Schedule to be filed by July 20, 2022. Telephone Conference set for 7/27/2022 at 10:00 AM. Time: 60 minutes. Judge David A. Ruiz on 6/16/2022. (H,Z) |
Filing 26 Joint Report of Parties' Planning Meeting - parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Related document(s) #24 .(Lewis, John) |
Filing 25 Reply in support of #22 Motion for immediate temporary restraining order filed by Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. (Petroff, Dimitre) |
Filing 24 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference to be held on 6/16/2022 at 09:00 AM by telephone before Judge David A. Ruiz. Conferencing instructions to be emailed to counsel. Lead counsel must participate unless excused by the Court upon written motion. Party representatives may attend but are not required. IMPORTANT: The parties are advised to carefully read this Order. Judge David A. Ruiz on 5/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Report of the Parties Planning Meeting) (G,CA) |
Filing 23 Response to #22 Motion for immediate temporary restraining order filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit May 20, 2022 Memorandum Opinion & Order Allied Pilots v. American Airlines)(Lewis, John) |
Filing 22 Motion for immediate temporary restraining order filed by Plaintiff Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support) (Petroff, Dimitre) |
Filing 21 Letter to Honorable David A. Ruiz filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Related document(s) #10 . (Lewis, John) |
Filing 20 Letter filed by Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. Related document(s) #5 . (Petroff, Dimitre) |
Filing 19 Joint Status Report filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Related document(s) #18 .(Lewis, John) |
![]() |
Random Reassignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to General Order 2022-03. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg. (S,HR) |
Case reassigned to District Judge David A. Ruiz pursuant to General Order 2022-03. Judge Bridget Meehan Brennan's assignment terminated due to Baker & Hostetler conflict. (S,HR) |
Case reassigned to District Judge Bridget Meehan Brennan pursuant to General Order 2022-04. (R,EM) |
IMPORTANT: [non-document] The Court CANCELS the 2/15/2022 in-person evidentiary hearing regarding Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court will RESET the hearing at a later date. (P,K) |
Filing 17 Reply in support of #15 Motion to stay Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit 2nd Declaration of L. Randy Fannon)(Petroff, Dimitre) |
Filing 16 Reply in support of #10 Motion for summary judgment and Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Defer Summary Judgment filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Second Declaration of Andrew Shepard)(Lewis, John) |
![]() |
Filing 15 Motion to stay Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. Related document(s) #5 , #10 . (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of its Motion to Defer Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment, #2 Affidavit Declaration of James Petroff)(Petroff, Dimitre) |
![]() |
Filing 14 Unopposed Motion for extension of time until 12-13-2021 to file response/reply to #10 Motion for summary judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Plaintiff Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. Related document(s) #10 . (McInerney, Joshua) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 13 Reply in support of #5 Motion for preliminary injunction filed by Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration of L. R. Fannon, #2 Exhibit B - Declaration of J. Ball, #3 Exhibit C - Declaration of T. Pontolillo)(Petroff, Dimitre) |
Filing 12 Notice of Motion to Reassign and Consolidate filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Motion to Reassign and Consolidate Filed in Case No. 1:21-cv-1870 SMART-TD v. NS)(Lewis, John) |
Filing 11 Opposition to #5 Motion for preliminary injunction filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Lewis, John) |
Filing 10 Motion for summary judgment and Memorandum in Support filed by Counter-Claimant Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's Complaint and as to Count I of NS's Counterclaim, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Andrew Shephard, #3 Exhibit A-F 1985 UTU, 1986 BLET Source of Supply Agreements, Two Flowback Agreements, Correspondence 2-25-1993, Correspondence 11-8-2000, Correspondence 5-7-2003, #4 Exhibit G-L NS Response, Correspondence 4-9-2010, Spreadsheet, PLB 4417, Award 32, PLB 5811, Award 76, 7-12-2011 Submission re PLB 5811, #5 Exhibit M-R Article V 2016 BLET Agreement, Article III 2015 BLET Agreement, Agreed to Questions and Answers re PPI, Article 4(b), Article 4(b) Crew Agreement, Correspondence 5-17-2016, #6 Exhibit S-W Correspondence 5-20-2016, Correspondence 8-12-2016, April 28, 2021 Email Gholson to Shepard, Deleskiewicz penalty claim, Two grievance records filed by SMART-TD, #7 Exhibit X-Z PLB 6619 Award I, Correspondence 8-11-2021 and Correspondence 8-20-2021, #8 Exhibit AA-GG Correspondence on 8-25-2021, 9-14-2021, 8-10-2021, 8-19-2021, 9-17-2021 and 9-24-2021)(Lewis, John) |
Filing 9 Motion for attorney Andrew J. Rolfes to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11117742, filed by Counter-Claimant Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Andrew J. Rolfes)(Lewis, John) |
Filing 8 Motion for attorney Robert S. Hawkins to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11117677, filed by Counter-Claimant Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Exhibit A - Affidavit of Robert S. Hawkins)(Lewis, John) |
![]() |
Filing 7 Motion for attorney Joseph P. Sirbak, II to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number AOHNDC-11109289, filed by Counter-Claimant Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Joseph P. Sirbak, II in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac ViceI)(Lewis, John) |
Filing 6 Answer to Defendant's Counterclaim filed by Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. Related document(s) #3 . (McInerney, Joshua) |
Filing 5 Motion for preliminary injunction filed by Plaintiff Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunctive Relief, #2 Proposed Order)(Petroff, Dimitre) |
Filing 4 Attorney Appearance by Dustin M. Dow filed by on behalf of Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Dow, Dustin) |
Filing 3 Answer to #1 Complaint, and, Counterclaim against Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen by Norfolk Southern Railway Company filed by Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Pub. L. Bd. 4417 Award 32, #2 Exhibit 2 Pub. L. Bd. 5811 Award 76, #3 Exhibit 3 8-11-21 Ltr from BLE General Chairman Dewayne L. Dehart, #4 Exhibit 4 8-20-21 Ltr from NSR to Dehart, #5 Exhibit 5 8-25-21 Ltr from BLET General Chairman L.R. Fannon, #6 Exhibit 6 9-14-21 Ltr from BLET General Chairman J. Sturdivant)(Lewis, John) |
Filing 2 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Norfolk Southern Railway Company. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,MT) |
Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against Norfolk Southern Railway Company. Filing fee paid, $402.00. Receipt # AOHNDC-11061080. Filed by Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Fully Executed 2015 NSR/BLET Agreement, #3 Proposed Summons) (M,MT) |
Judge Pamela A. Barker assigned to case. (M,MT) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge David A. Ruiz. (M,MT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen | |
Represented By: | Joshua D. McInerney |
Represented By: | Dimitre James Petroff |
Represented By: | D. James Petroff |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company | |
Represented By: | Dustin M. Dow |
Represented By: | Joseph P. Sirbak, II |
Represented By: | John B. Lewis |
Represented By: | Andrew J. Rolfes |
Represented By: | Robert S. Hawkins |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.