Legacy Roofing Services LLC v. Fusco et al
| Legacy Roofing Services LLC |
| Michael Fusco and Facility Products & Services LLC doing business as FPS Roofing |
| 1:2023cv01341 |
| July 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| James S Gwin |
| Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon Facility Products & Services LLC and Michael Fusco. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form). (L,MI)
|
|
Filing 2
Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Legacy Roofing Services LLC. (Paez-Paredes, Daniela)
|
|
Filing 1
Verified Complaint for damages and request for injunctive relief with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 402, Receipt number AOHNDC-12079490. Filed by Legacy Roofing Services LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Non-Solicitation Agreement, #2 Exhibit 2 - Employment Contract, #3 Exhibit 3 - ICC email, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Summons - Fusco, #6 Summons - FPS Roofing). (Paez-Paredes, Daniela)
|
|
Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (L,MI)
|
|
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (L,MI)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
