Cases 1 - 9 of 9
MCGILLVARY v. SCUTARI et al
as 1:2023cv22605
Plaintiff:
CALEB L. MCGILLVARY
Defendant:
NICHOLAS SCUTARI, NETFLIX, THEODORE ROMANKOW and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Legacy Roofing Services LLC v. Fusco et al
as 1:2023cv01341
Plaintiff:
Legacy Roofing Services LLC
Defendant:
Michael Fusco and Facility Products & Services LLC doing business as FPS Roofing
FUSCO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv25145
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MICHAEL FUSCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pfohl v. Fusco et al
as 2:2019cv03539
Defendant:
MAF Inc, Andrew Fusco, Fusco Group Partners Inc, The and others
Plaintiff:
James Pfohl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Michigan High School Athletic Association, Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv14223
Defendant:
Michigan High School Athletic Association, Incorporated, Chippewa Valley Schools, Rob Roberts and others
Kithier v. Michigan High School Athletic Association, Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv14227
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kithier
Defendant:
Michigan High School Athletic Association, Incorporated , Chippewa Valley Schools , Rob Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kasparian, Jr. v. Duffy Health Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv11551
Plaintiff:
Abraham Kasparian, Jr.
Defendant:
Duffy Health Center, Inc. , Duncan Macallister , Wesley Klein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Washington et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00611
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Washington , Isiah Staley , Gregory Beatty and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fusco v. Hay et al
as 1:2015cv01912
Plaintiff:
Michael Fusco
Defendant:
Jason Hay, J. Duncan , D. Lemacks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
