Finfrock v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
| Joseph W Finfrock |
| Gary C Mohr, Neil Turner and Becky Joyce |
| 3:2017cv01264 |
| June 16, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Toledo Office |
| Marion |
| Jeffrey J. Helmick |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendants' renewed motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 32), is granted. Defendants' initial motion for summary judgment, (Doc. No. 23), is denied as moot. Plaintiff's motions to strike, (Doc. No. 27 and Doc. No. 28), and his motion for a trial date, (Doc. No. 38), are denied. re 28 38 27 23 32 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 11/5/2019. (S,AL)
|
|
Filing
24
Memorandum Opinion: Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is denied. Defendants' motion to strike Plaintiff's motion for default is denied as moot. Defendants' motions to strike are denied. Plaintiff's motions to amend the complaint are granted. Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. Defendants' motion regarding their requests for admissions is granted. Defendants Mohr and the ODRC's motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted and they are dismissed as parties in this case. Plaintiff is directed to file his amended complaint within 30 days of his receipt of this Order. re 17 10 11 22 21 19 16 13 Judge Jeffrey J. Helmick on 5/7/2018. (S,AL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
